TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task
Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a Chevalier memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir's has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the the to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
For example, in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland, he was very wealthy, and it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However, evidence has recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. Critics thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money.
Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and conversed. However, critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately, because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended the held many years earlier.
Critics have also questioned the memoir's account of the Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian the by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
The article was about the memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt written toward the end of his life. The paragraph told that Chevalier was a controversial figure but since he met many famous peoples like kings and writers, his memoir has a valuable source about the eighteenth century. But some critics raised their doubts about the accuracy of his memoir.
The article represents various evidence presents against the Chevalier’s memoir. For example, in the first paragraph, the Chevalier wrote he was rich while he lived in Switzerland and he spent a lot of money in parties and gambling. However, there is evidence that he borrowed a considerable amount of money from a Swiss merchant. The critics argued that if he was really rich then why he would borrow the money. The professor Opposed this point by saying, every memoir of Chevalier wrote was accurate and borrowed money from someone does not mean he was not wealthy. The Speaker provides an example of her theory by saying, it was true that Chevalier spent a lot of money in parties and gambling. For this he needs money and for example, say, he had properties but not raw money so he borrowed money from Swiss merchant and properties to money conversion takes time.
The second calumny the topic presents, critics skeptical about the accuracy of the conversation between Chevalier and famous writer Voltaire. The critics believed that the memoir was written many years after the conversation occurred and critics point out that it was impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations that were held many years earlier. The speaker counters this part by saying, Chevalier regularly write his memoir and write as it happened. He also discusses this conversation with others.
The third point article presents against the accuracy of chevalier's memoir is the incident of Chevalier’s escaped from Venice jail. Critics questioned the memoir's account of Chevalier's escape from notorious prison in Venice, Italy. The memoir claims Chevalier escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that which was while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely chevalier bribed jailers to free him. Critics point out that Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe. The speaker opposes this claim by saying, in the prison other prisoners had the higher connection than Chevalier but they could not escape. Also, in the old Venice government's book, it was stated that after Chevalier's escaped the ceiling of the prison need to be repaired. The speaker questioned if chevalier bribed then why the prison needed a repair.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...meone does not mean he was not wealthy. The Speaker provides an example of her theo...
^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ions that were held many years earlier. The speaker counters this part by saying, C...
^^^
Line 7, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed then why the prison needed a repair.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, third, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 30.3222958057 185% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1373.03311258 168% => OK
No of words: 451.0 270.72406181 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11751662971 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66105504578 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 145.348785872 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467849223947 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 419.366225166 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2175129404 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.75123531868 0.272083759551 276% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239480558 0.0996497079465 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822751222382 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.458544571207 0.162205337803 283% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573708605017 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.