TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone in our society has got an opinion on political and social problems, and those problems are part of our life. Now, the question is, should teachers discuss these problems and give their opinions in the class or not. I personally think teachers should give their opinions in the class. This might help students to think clearly and in a healthy manner.
First of all, Students should know the social and political situation in their country, and by discussing t openly they can know how different people think differently about the problems. Teachers should discuss the problem because he is mature enough to understand the depth of the seriousness of the topic and he can present his views in an innocuous manner. If we turn the pages the history we know that students were in the front row when it came to standing against a political view and teachers influenced them to join the revolution.
Now, when a teacher gave his opinion on a political or social problem, the students can discuss them or can debate with him. I think this discussion can help students to think openly and talk about any problem in open mind. Furthermore, not discussing a problem does not mean the truth hides from students. Moreover, a teacher’s duty is to influence and makes ready the pupils for the future. Many students choose to be politicians and they should discuss the problems with others can give him an edge. As the best person for a discussion is a teacher because.
Now, many people argue that giving an opinion in a class and influence them is means indoctrinated them. Another thing is that everyone not might be not on the same page, so, instead of a healthy discussion might create a faux. But I personally think that this might not be a problem because it’s a teacher duty to control the students and influence them in a healthy way. Everyone should give their opinion in a class as long as the students are not mere children. Besides every teacher have to discuss the social and political condition in a sociology or political classes and there is no way running back from the discussion and we should respect everyone’s opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy manner" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ight help students to think clearly and in a healthy manner. First of all, Students should know ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an innocuous manner" with adverb for "innocuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the topic and he can present his views in an innocuous manner. If we turn the pages the history we kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...control the students and influence them in a healthy way. Everyone should give their opinion in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, another thing, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8252688172 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63025099838 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454301075269 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8418351557 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156800735908 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625638516202 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039019542271 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114873201847 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172031196391 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.