Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader; 3. Say nothing.
when hearing the lecturer standing on the stage is saying something wrong, we have several ways to reply it, including interrupt the speaker immediately, or wait until the meeting is over and talk to the lecturer directly, or even do nothing at all. Each choice seems plausible, however, for my perspective, I prefer to contact with organizer after the meeting finished, and the reasons are as below.
First and foremost, lecture and speaking has their own regulation and time schedule, and the organizer has already designed it in a precise way, like how much time do the speaker finish the speech, which part serves as rest, when could audiences ask questions, etc. if we interrupt the speaker without any permission, we probably disturb the regular process of lecture, and if this action consumes too much time, then the organizers needs to adjust the following parts immediately. Although our purposes are out of honesty or rigorousness, it imposes a negative effect on the activity and even ruins the whole.
Furthermore, when the meeting is over, we have more time to discuss with the speaker without limited time and questions. knowing that our conclusion may not be right or a simple misunderstanding either, it will be a efficient way to exchange the viewpoints with lecturer and draw a conclusion in a comprehensive way. For instances, once I attended a meeting at the school lecture hall, the speaker mentioned a concept of literary analysis, taught by our teacher few weeks ago, and gave a different explanation which sounds incorrect to me. however, I didn’t ask him at once until the meeting is completely over. when I encounter him at backstage, I conveyed my puzzle and he told me that it is a dichotomous problem and both interpretations are all proper. Since then, I recognize that the system of literary analysis is quite complex, and become more cautious before ask questions.
Although some people believes that asking the perplex points directly is beneficial to the learning progress of students, because they can receive positive feedback and adjust their cognition immediately, it is hard to say that these good results would also happens to speakers and other audiences. For the speakers, they might feel offence and irritate by interruption, and other audiences probably knows the answer and think it is a waste of time. As a result, it is better for us to convey our confusion face to face or at the rest part of speech.
In a nutshell, correcting the mistake is definitely necessary for our studying, but we should consider which methods should we choose to express at the same time. So, it seems plausible that talking to the speaker after meeting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when hearing the lecturer standing on the st...
^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a precise way" with adverb for "precise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d the organizer has already designed it in a precise way, like how much time do the speaker fini...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowing
...ker without limited time and questions. knowing that our conclusion may not be right or...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ple misunderstanding either, it will be a efficient way to exchange the viewpoint...
^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a comprehensive way" with adverb for "comprehensive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nts with lecturer and draw a conclusion in a comprehensive way. For instances, once I attended a meeti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 618, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...e until the meeting is completely over. when I encounter him at backstage, I conveye...
^^^^
Line 13, column 43, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...though some people believes that asking the perplex points directly is beneficial to the le...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 259, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
... say that these good results would also happens to speakers and other audiences. For th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02227171492 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82904261643 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570155902004 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8587503677 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.9375 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0625 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135648579568 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412778470709 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436054273195 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758605957433 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488286370652 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.