TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the passage are both about Hydrogen based fuel cell engines. The reading claims that fuel cell engines have myriad of advantages over internal-combustion engines. However, the lecturer does not feel that fuel cell engines are as beneficial as the author assumes.
First of all, lecture thinks that use of hydrogen to generate electricity is not a solution. Hydrogen is not easily available in the usable form. In order to utilize energy and create electricity from hydrogen, it is very necessary to make it in pure liquid form which is a highly artificial substance. On the other hand author assumes fuel cell engines are based on renewable resources.
Secondly, Production of pure hydrogen creates lot of pollution which will affect the environment. The purification process of hydrogen require lot of energy and burning of oil and coal. Considering these aspects lecturer thinks that fuel cell engines are not at all a perfect source of power.
Thirdly, It is also not a cost saving option because of the highly expensive manufacturing process. Its manufacturing require the use of platinum which is a rarely available and highly expensive metal. Manufacturers have not been so far successful in replacing the metal platinum with another material. While the reading states that it is an economically competitive to use fuel cell engines and people have to spend very less money for that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aspects'' or 'aspect's'?
Suggestion: aspects'; aspect's
...ning of oil and coal. Considering these aspects lecturer thinks that fuel cell engines ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17903930131 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88901511672 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0035073968 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7142857143 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3571428571 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481836214066 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159052822517 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117727482361 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284124527679 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791675040214 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.