tpo 40
The reading discusses several reasons why humans cannot live on Venus. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and cast doubts on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First, the author argues that Venus's atmospheric pressure is extremely high, which has the ability to crush and annihilate everything landed on it. Conversely, The lecturer brings up the idea that scholars could have made some floating stations like balloons above Venus's surface,15 kilometers above its surface, where the pressure is more likely to what human experienced on earth.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that Venus lacks reservoirs of water and oxygen, so human being cannot survive in that situation and should supply water from the earth. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that since Venus has compounds like carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, it is not necessary to import water from the earth to there, as scientists can make water from these compounds.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that Venus' surface is hardly exposed to sunlight. Moreover, most of the lights will be reflected back to space. Therefore it is difficult to make solar power cells. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue due to the fact that in the altitude of 15 kilometers from the surface, the clouds are less thicker. Additionally, they can use both the light emitted to the surface and reflected back for electricity generation purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lights will be reflected back to space. Therefore it is difficult to make solar power cel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less thick'?
Suggestion: less thick
...meters from the surface, the clouds are less thicker. Additionally, they can use both the li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2264957265 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54997890812 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623931623932 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4690676763 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349950052996 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110459537065 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628005940716 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174134849156 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728831661035 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.