TPO 41
The reading passage lists three reasons to support that government should not create stricter regulations for handling and storing coal cash, while the professor in the lecture disagrees all the reasons and insists the need of new regulations.
The first reason the lecturer argues is that regulations which exist now are not sufficient because they are only suitable for the new landfills. Since some old ones are not added liners, some harmful components would ooze into the ground and pollute the underground water. That is to say, the claim in the reading that existing rules are enough is not convincing.
Secondly, the reading holds the view that stricter regulations will raise the concerns from general people and they may think coal ash is dangerous, so the recycling of this material will be hindered. The professor, however, mentions that mercury, another poisonous material, is also under a strict supervision but few people concerned the safety of using it. According to this similar example, people will continue to use coal ash as before. Thus, the professor fights against the view in the reading again.
Furthermore, the professor represents her idea that it is worthwhile for people to pay a little more for a better and cleaner environment. Also, by accounting in math, the average price will up only by 1% after the government enacts stricter regulations in this field, which is far from the suggestion in the reading that the price of electricity will increase sharply because of the increase of the total cost.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11904761905 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64628692079 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9646057481 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308329730996 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106729992335 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765130569921 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166882147412 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459909326902 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.