TPO 41- Integrated
In the lecture, the professor makes several points as to why create new and strict regulation is indispensable and power companies should control and store coal ash. In fact, the professor's lecture casts doubt on the reading through a number of points elaborated as follows.
The first point that professor mentions to refute the reading is that, some regulation such as using liner special materials which prevents coal ash components from leaking into the soil does not make sense. According to professor, this regulation is not sufficient. This is because power companies just use liner for new landfill and several of old disposal sites caused significant damages. For example, the harmful component of coal ash seep into ground water and contaminated drinking water. Thus, this point proves the main idea of the reading wrong.
Another important point that the professor points out to undermine the validity of the reading is that, create strict rules for controlling and storing will discourage the recycling of coal ash which is not true. As is pointed out by the professor, strict rules for storing and handling coal ash does not mean that consumers will stop using recycled coal ash products. For example mercury is a hazardous material which controlled by some striking rules and for 50 years is safe and a few people concern about it. So people are free to use coal ash. Therefore, this points made in the lecture also renders the main idea of the reading invalid.
The last important point that the professor brought up, which runs counter to the reading is that, strict new regulation may increase cost of handling and storing coal ash which does not true. As a matter of fact, the professor asserts that, this strict regulation can increase the cost of power companies but it is not a lot. According to the analyses, the cost of strict regulation for power companies is approximately 50 billion dollars which is massive. But this is only 1% of customers bills which is not big percent. Hence, this point is in contrast the main idea of the reading.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
why create new and strict regulation is indispensable
why creating new and strict regulation is indispensable //'creating new and strict regulation' is the subject. You can't put a verb after why
some regulation
some regulations
create strict rules for controlling and storing will discourage the recycling
creating strict rules for controlling and storing will discourage the recycling
a hazardous material which controlled by some striking rules
a hazardous material which is controlled by some striking rules
a hazardous material controlled by some striking rules
which is not big percent.
which is not a big percent.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Words: 349 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 12
No. of Words: 349 250
No. of Characters: 1679 1200
No. of Different Words: 158 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.322 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.811 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.499 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.529 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.617 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.525 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of points elaborated as follows. The first point that professor mentions ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as to', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.280104712042 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.164921465969 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0968586387435 0.0723426182421 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0340314136126 0.0435111971325 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00523560209424 0.0277247811725 19% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.120418848168 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0418848167539 0.0370669169778 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53270169523 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0183246073298 0.0208969081088 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00785340314136 0.00154638098197 508% => OK
Determiners: 0.109947643979 0.128158765124 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0130890052356 0.0158828679856 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0235602094241 0.0114777025283 205% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2069.0 1645.83664459 126% => OK
No of words: 349.0 271.125827815 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92836676218 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340974212034 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269340974212 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183381088825 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120343839542 0.113142543107 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53270169523 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458452722063 0.539623497131 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.8233931309 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5294117647 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0130231437 49.3711431718 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.705882353 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 47.4635091859 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.16666666667 1.90840788429 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.616510553123 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159989972235 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105301153177 0.0787303798458 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.552509935464 0.631733273073 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164501329574 0.139662658121 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265233638351 0.266732575781 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123424310166 0.103435571967 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.476133776013 0.414875509568 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0911578020869 0.0530846634433 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.477428329087 0.40443939384 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548996376896 0.0528353158467 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.