TPO 41 Integrated essay
The reading and the lecture are both discuss about some suggestions that the United states government should create new, much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash due to the great concern about those damages to the environment by such harmful chemicals.
Firstly, the reading claims that some regulations about this issue have already existed and the government has require those companies to use liner-special material that prevents coal ash components from leaking into the soil and contaminating the surrounding environment. however, the lecture disagrees that by using those liner-special materials indeed have effect on new ponds to some extent, but it doesn’t come in any influences on those old ponds, therefore the accuracy of this regulation is still not enough.
Secondly, the reading states that the stricter rules might discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products. Although recycling coal ash reduces the need to dispose of it in other ways and presents no environmental danger. however, if the stricter rules are adopted, consumers may become concerned that recycled coal ash products are just too dangerous, and may stop buying the products. On the flip side, the lecture argues that by taking mercury as an example, it is hardly to believe that the reduction of using coal ash products will go into effect just by adopted the rules .same as using in the past mercury , there wasn't any reduction in population of consumers of its recycled products.
new Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:ZH-TW;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">Lastly, the reading said that strict regulations would result in a significant increase in disposal and handling costs for the power companies, nonetheless, power companies would be forced to increase the price of electricity, which would not be accepted by the general public. On the other hand, the lecture contends that it might cost 15 billion in order to save the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
... already existed and the government has require those companies to use liner-special ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...taminating the surrounding environment. however, the lecture disagrees that by using th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s and presents no environmental danger. however, if the stricter rules are adopted, con...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 587, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...go into effect just by adopted the rules .same as using in the past mercury , ther...
^^
Line 9, column 622, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rules .same as using in the past mercury , there wasnt any reduction in population...
^^
Line 9, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...me as using in the past mercury , there wasnt any reduction in population of consumer...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...onsumers of its recycled products. new Roman';mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-b...
^^^
Line 13, column 392, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ity, which would not be accepted by the general public. On the other hand, the lecture contend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67105263158 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.88861586698 2.5805825403 228% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.3931393774 49.2860985944 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.555555556 110.228320801 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7777777778 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.574201746509 0.272083759551 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23461384167 0.0996497079465 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10251666462 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30013587336 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849698910671 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.3589403974 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 53.8541721854 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.