TPO-41(INTEGRATED WRITING)

Essay topics:

TPO-41(INTEGRATED WRITING)

The reading states that the concern about the dangerous waste material of burning coal, ash coal, is increasing. The representatives of power companies believe that there is no need to create new restrict regulations on the ash coal and provide three supports of it. However, the professor explains that it is essential to put much stricter regulation and refutes the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the restrict regulations already exist and the companies use the liner-special material to prevent the leakage of contaminations to the environment so it is not essential to make a new rule. The professor refutes this point by stating that the new ponds and landfills are obliged to use the liner and the existed ponds and landfills which have a huge portion of the environmental pollution are not equipped by the liner.
Second, the reading averts that the strict regulation has adverse effects on recycled ash coal products and it concerns consumers to stop using them. However, the professor contends that the strict regulations are implemented in recycling toxic material such as mercury for about 50 years but the use of mercury recycled products has not declined and it does not make consumers worried not to buy them.
Third, the reading asserts that the increase in disposal and handling costs will affect the price of electricity. The professor refutes this point by stating that it just will increase one percent of household bills specially the price of electricity which is worth to pay this cost to have a healthy environment.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...easons. First, the reading claims that the restrict regulations already exist and the compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83928220462 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7170801823 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.777777778 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477419464944 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191311690163 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107831066415 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257952352116 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117468956292 0.0443174109184 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.