TPO 42
Both the reading and the listening discuss solutions of harmed birds because of the modern glassy buildings. The reading passage gives three solutions to manage the damage, but the listening denies each solution by using its inefficient ways.
The reading passage firstly mentions using one-way glass. However, the lecturer denies the idea that using one-way glass because she mentions that one-way glass will make a mirror outside of the building. The birds cannot identify the mirror as a mirror, thus they will be more in danger than glassy buildings.
Furthermore, the article support to paint the glass because birds will understand the glassy building as a building and turn the building and to paint a building will become innovated architect's design. The listening refutes the solution by using that lined colorful patterns will be assumed like a hole by birds and they will attempt to cross the building by that hole.
Finally, the reading passage suggests creating an artificial magnetic field that makes birds avoid glassy buildings. Nevertheless, the professor emphasizes that the birds use magnetic field only in long-distance travel, such as from cold country to a warm country. they use light and eyes in short distance travel, hence the artificial magnetic field cannot help to birds' direction from big glassy buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...as from cold country to a warm country. they use light and eyes in short distance tr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...rtificial magnetic field cannot help to birds direction from big glassy buildings.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31924882629 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52059777107 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2188124475 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40387005545 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163041465729 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504605011483 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226978387162 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689305540216 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.