TPO 42
The reading claims that because birds do not distinguish building glasses, each year a large number of them are harmed by hitting the glasses. So to avoid this devastating problem, the reading proposes three solutions. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and refutes them all.
First, the reading passage claims that by using one-way glass, because birds can not see inside it, they do not fly through it. Conversely, the professor dismisses the issue due to the fact that one-way glasses in fact act like mirrors. for instance, they reflect the sky and trees, which flyers can not distinguish the reflection between real objects and them, so they fly through them too.
furthermore, the author argues that by using colorful designs like colorful lines on the glass, birds could see them and avoid flying through them. In the contrast, the speaker underlines the fact that these kinds of patterns on the window have an opening which birds try to fly through it, so the opening must be small enough to avoid this, which has a negative impact on the people who live there because the inside of the building would be too dark.
Finally, the reading asserts that by using magnetic fields, birds could divert their path to free space, so they do not hit the glasses. on the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea that although birds use their magnetic compass for long distances, however, for flying short distances like cities, they use their eyes and the light. So this would not have positive effects on them either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...distinguish building glasses, each year a large number of them are harmed by hitting the glasses....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...e-way glasses in fact act like mirrors. for instance, they reflect the sky and tree...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...em, so they fly through them too. furthermore, the author argues that by using colorf...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... space, so they do not hit the glasses. on the contrary, the lecturer brings up th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, for instance, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90458015267 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24453768518 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538167938931 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.059202098 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370021837748 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134167376672 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100536987638 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219567859552 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102375835166 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.