Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that training children have played a prominent role since the dawn of civilization. Some ingenious teachers have developed strategies for training children more efficiently in recent centuries. Teaching by manifold teachers in one of the mentioned strategies. Although some people believe that learning by various teachers may lead to decreasing the level of recognition of students by teachers, I have a different point of view. As far as I am concerned, in order for children to learn various sciences in more detail, they have to learn each new material in each field by a distinct teacher. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first and probably foremost reason to be mentioned is that students will learn broader materials by having various teachers rather than having one. In fact, each teacher is more specialized in the special subject, for example, mathematics, physics, and so forth, and could convey more information to students in detail. To shed light on this matter, I would like to mention an example of my personal experience. When I was at elementary school, in the first year we had only one teacher for all of our lessons. Our teacher was good enough in theoretical lessons, but he had a lack of enough skills in laboratory lessons. Each time we were at the laboratory, he was just sitting on his chair and teaching us theoretical stuff again. So all the time we were learning the same materials. However, in the second year, our school hired another talented teacher who was an expert in doing laboratory experiments. So the first teacher taught us theoretical lessons, while the second teacher went for experimental ones.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that by doing so, students will be able to have different viewpoints and could learn to evaluate a problem by having a multidimensional vision. In fact, each teacher teaches them a new way of solving problems, So this paves the way for them to develop their minds creatively. Based on a recently revealed research in my country, in the field of teaching, it shows that there is a direct relationship between being more teachers and having higher creativity among students.
To make a long story short, one can conclude that because of my personal experience regarding this concept, and the noteworthy research in this field, it is better for schools to hire more teachers to bear distinct duties because it will raise students’ creativity as well as learning broader materials from various teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently revealed research'.
Suggestion: recently revealed research
...evelop their minds creatively. Based on a recently revealed research in my country, in the field of teaching...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roader materials from various teachers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, while, for example, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02546296296 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8353287802 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7561768003 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.263157895 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242172751555 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741958889854 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603193550086 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144015641086 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204051439169 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.