TPO48
The reading claims that recently, the population of a particular species of a frog has been decreased drastically which has severe and irreversible consequences for the ecosystem in which they are living. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that nowadays, by using large amounts of pesticides in farmlands for the devastation of insects, these kinds of frogs are subjected to extinction, because pesticides spread to their habitats and kill them as well. So the government should enact laws to forbid using pesticides in the areas near to frogs habitats. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is not economically fair for the farmers that are farming there to not have allowed using pesticides while other farmers do so. Actually, they will lose the market since they can not compete with them.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that researchers have found ways to treat frogs that are infected by a type of fungus. By applying it to frogs on a large scale, we would able to treat the infected frogs. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that it is almost impossible to treat them on the large scale because of the fact that this kind of treatment should be applied to every individual frog, In fact, each frog must be captured and then be treated by this way. additionally, we must apply the treatment to each new generation, since it is not possible to apply to their eggs.
Finally, the reading asserts that overusing frogs habitats' water, such as wetlands, leads to decreasing their population since they are extremely dependent on water sources. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that overusing also affects their living conditions, but nowadays, the major problem is global warming. Indeed climate change causes frogs to extinct in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'frog'.
Suggestion: frog
...d using pesticides in the areas near to frogs habitats. Conversely, the lecturer brin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ssible to treat them on the large scale because of the fact that this kind of treatment should be applie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...ptured and then be treated by this way. additionally, we must apply the treatment to each ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not possible to apply to their eggs. Finally, the reading asserts that overus...
^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...s, the major problem is global warming. Indeed climate change causes frogs to extinct ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, then, well, while, in contrast, in fact, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01567398119 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64394371728 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554858934169 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0914617391 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436018108583 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146508933823 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843147575729 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236524900141 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480507124502 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.