TPO 42-glass danger for birds
The lecture and the passage discuss some solutions to prevent birds from the danger of the glasses building. Although the passage claims that there are three ways to avoid birds to injure, the speaker refutes these ideas through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that by using some specific glasses which are transparent only from the inside of the building, the other side could be a barrier for birds' path. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the one-way glasses reflex the outside just like a mirror which in turn could be as bad as regular glasses due to the reason that birds could not recognize themseleves in mirrors. As a result, these glasses could reflect either sky or trees; thus, the birds might fly to them.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that glasses with painted design could inhibit birds from fly through the windows, the speaker argues that birds would percieve the unpainted segment on the windowsa as open holes. So, the unpainted parts should be very small which in turn caused the darkness for the people inside of the buildings. Therefore, this solution would not be practical.
Finally, although the passage says that by exploiting some equippments providing magnetic fields which directs birds to right path, the professor disagrees by mentioning that it is true that birds are using magnetic fields to travel. However, they utilize these magnetic fields for long distances like traveling from a cold country to a warmer one. He also states that in short distances like moving from one city to another one, the birds use their eyes to find their pathes. Then, this idea would not be effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in contrast, in short, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30293200905 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.249521071 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420393882791 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157830398248 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691074373926 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261649954305 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379560885822 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.