TPO 43
The article claims three possible arguments about the possible behavioral characteristics of agnostids. Along with those points, reader provided reasons of support. On the other hand, the lecturer counters all these specific thoughts and presents clues to call into the information in the passage.
First, the discourse avers that agnostids may have very fast swimming capability then, as well as used to hunt smaller animals. Nevertheless, the professor casts doubt about the theory stating that to become a good predator arthropods, large well-developed eye is a must. Whereas, from examining the fossils of agnostids it was found that, their eyes were not only small, poorly constructed eyes, but also sometimes near to blindness. Professor furthermore added that even with other special sensory organs arthropods can become good predators, but that is also not found in the fossils.
Second, the reader concurs that they may have lived on the seafloor and survived eating dead organisms or by grazing on bacteria, while the professor dispute this by telling that seafloor survivors are usually slow moving and confined in a small geographical area. However, finding of evidence of agnostids in a large distributed are suggests that they may not have been sluggish mover, rather were fast mover.
Third, the reading discusses that agnostids may have been parasites and used to dwell in and feed larger organisms. On the contrary, the lectures debates thIs by saying that those arthropods that live as a parasite, are usually constrained in aspect of their population. Whereas, very large population of certain agostids excludes this last theory as, if the number of parasites is too big, then the host will be dead.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32846715328 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71591705417 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5173959419 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392649553709 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118097281204 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084230986338 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202930859998 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863229414841 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.