Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Job is a essential as well as unavoidable part of human life. Since civilization has occured, new companies have grown, new process of financial dealing has been established, thus officially a scheduled work has been established. Job nowadays not only have become the way of earning money but also way of showing our potency. According to the statement, Many people enjoys to work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where five days a week for shorter hours. I am in an enigmatic situation whether to agree or disagree, but if I have to choose one, I will choose the long hour jobs and I have two definite reasons to support my opinion which will be discussed below.
First of all, doing a long hour job just for three days gives us extra time to carry on our education side by side. Many student now-a-days do jobs as well want to continue their study. If they get four days completely which they utilize only for themselves they can attend classes, give exam and thus earn an additional degree which will benefit him/her in the future life. As educational qualifications as well as experience, both are considered for better job in the real world, it becomes more handy to get experience when gaining knowledge. For example, one of my friend Nick used to work part-time in a software store three days a week. He was also having a online masters program during the for days he is free. After completing the course he got job in Intel.
On the other hand, doing a long hour job gives couples ample time to take care of their children. Parent is other name of shelter. Children love to have their mom, dad in the home. To raise children well, it is necessary to take care of them properly. In case of both husband and wife doing job simultaneously, three days job can separate their schedule and thus makes it easier to give time to their children. So, thus at least one member is always at home. Therefore, the process of socialization goes smoothly.
To wrap it up, I think doing long hour jobs for three days is more advantageous over short hour jobs. It gives us enough time not only to gather further knowledge, but also to raise our children properly. Thus people may find it enjoyable if they do work long hours just three days a week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Job is a essential as well as unavoidable part o...
^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many students'.
Suggestion: Many students
...to carry on our education side by side. Many student now-a-days do jobs as well want to cont...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e three days a week. He was also having a online masters program during the for d...
^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...program during the for days he is free. After completing the course he got job in Int...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, i think, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55609756098 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50192073747 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5829716171 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9090909091 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417659217273 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116127228692 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128431856737 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270620158932 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110672162424 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.