TPO 43
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses Agnostid fossils found in rocks were similar to modern insects. However the lecturer cast doubt on informations present in passages and refutes them all.
Firstly, the author of the passage mentions Agnostids were free-swimming predators. In contrast, the professor opposes this point by saying that free-swimming species have well developed eye and vision ability, while Agnostids had poor eyesight and some of them totally blind. Thus, these kind of species could not free-swimming predators.
Secondly, the reading asserts that Agnostids lived on seafloor such as many promitive arthopods and ate from dead organism. On the other hand, the lecturer rebutes this point and says that see-floor species are not fast and do not travel far away, they are local organism. Meanwhile, Agnostids found in large distance and spread throughly. Hence, this is not logical they were seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the reading passage mentions Agnostids were parasites and lived inside of host animal and ate from them. The lecture refutes this point and says that the number of parasites are limited because too much parasites inside host eventually kill the host. While, the large number of Agnostids were found and this means that they were not parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n rocks were similar to modern insects. However the lecturer cast doubt on informations...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...t and some of them totally blind. Thus, these kind of species could not free-swimming pred...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...er of parasites are limited because too much parasites inside host eventually kill t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3756097561 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53922939122 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0728486292 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366075821213 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145221630916 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862626711991 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218109886929 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305345507598 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.