TPO 43- the Integrated writing task
Both sources discuss some aspects of Agnostids life. This piece of ensuing paragraphs summarizes how the points that mentioned by the author refutes by the speaker.
First of all, the writer states that the Agnostids are predators and hunt small creatures in the oceans. In contrast, the speaker states that typical predators have visionary feature but this tiny creature was blind. She goes on to states that we have no evidence of this behavior in the Agnostids. This is one way that the lecturer cast doubts on the reading.
Secondly, the writer says that the Agnostids lived on the sea floor and ate the dead body of other animal or remains of bacteria. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that seafloor animals are mostly slow animals and live locally, but the Agnostids was moved fast which is unusual behavior for animals who live on the seafloor.
Lastly, the writer asserts that the Agnostids feed on the large organism and live on primitive fishes. Conversely, the speaker makes the points that the population of the Agnostids was significant, and these animals could kill their hosts. She then points out that the considerable amount of the Agnostids is refuted the hypothesis.
This argument is the ultimate way that the lecture casts doubt on the passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01877934272 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46793896606 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8544434227 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0833333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289823984396 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103045045847 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546241572123 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138762100659 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659649025117 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.