TPO40 integrated
Both sources of material discuss the possibility of long-lasting human living on Venus planet. Whereas the author of the reading states that this planet is not hospitable for human, the lecturer says that if we utilize balloons which are flooding in the 17 k.m above of Venus’s surface, it would be possible.
This piece of ensuing paragraphs summarizes how the speaker refutes the points mentioned by the writer.
First of all, the writer claims that the pressure of the Venus atmosphere is much more significant than the Earth surface, so it is not possible for humans to land. In contrast, The speaker states that if people use the solution mentioned above and stay above the Venus surface, the pressure that they feel is as much as earth surface. This is one way that the lecture casts doubt on the reading.
Secondly, the writer says that carbon is the principal chemical element of Venus and no water we have there. On the contrary, the speaker argues that we can manipulate the process of water created by atmosphere materials and have water in the balloons.
Finally, the writer asserts that a limit amount of sun lights reach the Venus ground; therefore, we cannot produce electricity. Conversely, the lecturer makes the points that clouds reflect sun lights, and we can produce electricity by employ both kind of direct-from sun- and indirect -could’s reflection- sources of lights.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both talking about the obstacles in front of human living on Venus, the speech appropriately disputed the three main points made in the passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, talking about, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08270676692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65563654323 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4981042485 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06452816374 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316362347805 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115307187182 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731320303667 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139474064835 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083754102608 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.