TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the lecture and the reading discuss the silver coin at a Native American archaeological site. While the reading states that the coin is fake in order to mislead the society, the lecture refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the Native American site in Maine is very far from the place the coins were discovered. However, the lecture argues that there are many objects at a Native American archaeologist site that is brought from other far places. Furthermore, the professor states people from the state of Maine traveled great far away and they brought the silver back to Maine.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that other valuable staff or coins did not discover in this site. The lecture counters this point by stating Norse does not a settlement in the special place. According to the professor, Norse packed up the coin and other valuable things to bring to the North.
Ultimately, the reading passage argues that Norse knew that he is travel to North America and the coins would be useless in this area. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that coins would not like money to the Norse but it was appealing because of the beauty. Moreover, the professor says the native North American used this coin as a neckless or jewelry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83035714286 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35550199923 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.6693661726 49.2860985944 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3636363636 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473573046569 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196365148043 0.0996497079465 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665204718521 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293781050121 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348888238067 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.