The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
That nowadays good friends profoundly is a principal. A question which is highly debatable is, whether people should maintain a friendship with old friends. Although, some people strongly believe that people have to make new friends in each situation. Nevertheless, I believe that maintaining the friendship with a small number of people has a direct influence on people life.
First of all, one of the persuasive reasons that authenticate the thesis is that good old friend play a key role in our life to remember the past and help us to make a better future. It would not be too great an exaggeration to say that nowadays, due to close interaction with an old friend, many friends have information about all aspect of our life. In fact, old friends because of close relationship company their friends in both bad situation and good circumstance. For examples, my old friends know my personality very well, when I face some problem she helps me to remember the past that I was in the same situation and because of my bad decision I had a lot of problems. Therefore, my old friends help me to prevent a bad decision and learn from the past. There are many more examples, but I believe this is one real story that clearly shows the importance of old friends in individual life.
In addition, old friends have a crucial effect on our happiness. Broadly speaking, old friends know how they can make their friend happy because spent a lot of time together. to clarify, old friends not only help us to learn from our wrong decision but also they know what behavior makes us happy. For instance, all my old friends know, when I am sad, I like to shop but I do not like to go shopping alone when they realized that I am sad they suggest met to go shopping together. All in all, the role of good friends that play in making us happy is enormous.
In conclusion, although there are many who believe that it is better to make friends easily with each people. I disagree. I think to remember the past in order to prevent other mistakes, close friendship with the small number of people is a good option. I strongly believe that old friends are supportive and help their friends in each circumstance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...maintain a friendship with old friends. Although, some people strongly believe that peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ve that maintaining the friendship with a small number of people has a direct influence on people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...y because spent a lot of time together. to clarify, old friends not only help us t...
^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mall number of people is a good option. I strongly believe that old friends are s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62148337596 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63098148336 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450127877238 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.846303774 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.388888889 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234454613921 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882816069159 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607515164865 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173795846514 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679667601419 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.