According to the reading passage, archaeologists found a European silver coin in 1957. The coin is dating back to the eleventh century. Many people think that the coin had belonged to the European explorer, Norse, who visited North America in about a thousand years ago. The author explains that the archaeologists don’t believe this story on account of three reasons. However, the professor opposes all of them.
First, the author mentions that the coin was discovered in a site far away from the Norse's settlements in Canada. The professor clarifies that although Norse stood in Canada as the American natives always traveled in large distances, the coin presumably had released in one of their trips. So, with the proposed explanation, we can imply that the evidence is true.
Second, the reading passage describes that there weren’t other similar coins to corroborate that Norse had visited the American natives. However, the professor refutes this assertion. She states it is probable that the other coins came back to Europe by the explorers and only one of them had remained in North America.
Finally, the professor and author both confirm that the native people didn’t use the silver coin as money. Nevertheless, the professor believes that in contrast with the reading passage the Americans’ native may have used those coins as the jewelry. He argues that the natives liked unusual and beautiful staffs such as a silver coin to implement them in their jewelry.
In brief, the professor and author give the contradicting ideas about the possibility of the historic presence of the silver coins in North America. The professor asserts that the all the evidence seem authentic and none of the reasons discussed in the reading passage are convincing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, in brief, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21254355401 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72805611782 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9554533249 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468772855891 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151758424942 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919259144107 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259474565848 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638049159608 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.