No, I disagree with the proposed statement surely, because working hastly cannot lead to the progress or improvment. I think we should focus on our works and professions to do it as well. Although the speed is more important in nowadays such as electronic industries, people should be catious in their works because the following reasons:
First, as the people speed up their works without sufficent catious, they will make mistakes and so it just means not only thoes works don't be completed but also, there exists twice works which should be done. First, they ought to fix the following failuers and after that redo the works.
Second, working fast does not mean that work done prefectly. If CEOs of companies forced their emploeeys to work fast without any program, they really want to satisfy their bosses and so wont care about their own works. For example, the Wolfswagen company in the compitance with other automobile industries forced their emploeeys to work hard to get the more profits and cheated its customers with low quality viechles. So instead of getting profit Wolfswagen losed much of its investments on the new cars.
Finally, I think people should enjoy their life also their vocation. I mean if the people work quickly and don't care about their own life they lose some irreversible times which they could play with their childs our enjoy with watching television and so on. Therefore insted of non-stop working I suggest we can enjoy their life and also work together more efficently.
So, working hastely can be harmful as the probable mistakes can waste the time and also decrese qualitiy. Also it burn some beatiful time which we cannot revert it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...l. Although the speed is more important in nowadays such as electronic industries, people s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d so it just means not only thoes works dont be completed but also, there exists twi...
^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... I mean if the people work quickly and dont care about their own life they lose som...
^^^^
Line 6, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...joy with watching television and so on. Therefore insted of non-stop working I suggest we...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ste the time and also decrese qualitiy. Also it burn some beatiful time which we can...
^^^^
Line 8, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'burns'?
Suggestion: burns
...time and also decrese qualitiy. Also it burn some beatiful time which we cannot reve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, well, for example, i mean, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94699646643 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38074450789 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565371024735 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1339020334 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.692307692 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179165013566 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696676222043 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514845303781 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109966430546 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453030218806 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.