tpo 45
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about regardless of whether or not bee exist on Earth 200 years ago. The article strongly postulates that old fossil bee nest which have found 200 million year old fossilized tree is not strong evidence to prove bees existence. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that argument that made by reading passage is not convincing for three main reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, there is no actual fossilized bee found that date to 200 hundred years ago. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that at that time no tree produce sticky liquid which is the main factor for preserve fossil, so that bees' fossil could not remain.
Secondly, the reading states that flowering plants which is closely evolved with bee first discovered on Earth 125 million years ago. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. He argues that it is possible to bee had eaten non-flowering plants before flowering plants appeared and after flower plants started to grown, bee adopted to eat them.
Finally, the reading claims that fossilized nest which is found in Arizona is similar with modern bee nest; but its detail is not well structured like modern nest. On the other hand, the lecturer thinks that it is already proven by chemical evidence which is waterproof. Moreover, he feels that this waterproof material is similar both ancient bee and modern bee that they can can emit.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about ancient bees; existence, the three main points made in the reading passage are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...onflicting opinions about regardless of whether or not bee exist on Earth 200 years ago. The a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...ain factor for preserve fossil, so that bees fossil could not remain. Secondly, the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: can
...th ancient bee and modern bee that they can can emit. In conclusion, although the rea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08058608059 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46832093668 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8702666767 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591123290851 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276475812351 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200458218477 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0357291770759 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236268318981 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.