tpo 46
The reading declares that transforming some medical information about patients to electronic databases has several supposed methods. However, the lecture finds all ideas dubious and calls them impractical, and she firmly believes that the supports are not compelling.
First, the reading claims that the utilize of the electronic version can provide an apt ground for reducing the cost of some extra tasks. Nevertheless, the lecture rejects that the point by mentioning other aspects of this issue. Although keep electronic format can be useful, the doctors need to use some paper of records to emergency backup of their patients. Therefore, they should dedicate some money to store some data.
Second, the author states that electronic information can lead to decrease the number of errors that are created by some paper records. On the contrary, the professor concedes the viewpoint that the doctors will need to paper records in order to examine the condition of illness. Moreover, using some paper data can cause some handwriting errors. Hence, many mistakes will be created by the employment.
Third, according to the reading, aiding research is one of the advantages of using electronic records. Conversely, the lecture opposes that the doctors will have some problems to access these data because of some laws that are defined by the US.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing. First, the reading claims that the utilize of the electronic version can provide a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32710280374 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61401718797 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593457943925 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4675051226 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365861812264 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116967770149 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820077688393 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196711577667 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399476493792 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.