The professor discusses the disadvantages of electronic medical recrord storage. The information she presents contradicts facts outlined in the reading passage.
First the lecturer mention that the doctors who have used to recording medical information on paper do not discontinue their conventional procedure. They even do not throw away the information and consequently, they incur the storage cost. On the other hand, according to the reading, electronic medical records do not occupy space and all the doctors will definitely use the electronic method.
Second, the speaker states that docotors still utilize pen and paper in order to examine the patients and take note. Furthermore, they are office staffs who add the hand written information to the computer at later time. Thus, the error arised from poor hand writting still exists. However, the reading specifies that poor hand writing and improper transcription of information and its resulting errors will be avoidable if doctors use electronic method.
Third, the professor points out that accessing medical information subjects to accessing private information law in United States. In this manner, if researchers needs to have access this information, they must follow strict laws and request permissions from different centers. Moreover, patients are able to ban the access to their medical information and this fact can cause many issues regards to researchers. In contrast, the reading makes it clear that electronic medical records can help researchers with increasing the speed of search and making it possible to access them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...electronic method. Third, the professor points out that accessing medical inform...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55737704918 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84637564988 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58606557377 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9738702124 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403961051675 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129486562608 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942294504499 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217045049942 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913156274696 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.