tpo 46 Q1
In this set of materials, the reading states that the advantages of using electronic databases for patients records outweigh the using of traditional paper-based record storing and provide some reasons to support. However, the professor believes that it is not possible to change the conventional way of keeping patients record and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that using electronic records is an effective opportunity to reduce costs. On the contrary, the professor says that the amount of money which will be saved by this action is not significant. She also states that the medical system needs to keep records particularly in emergency situations, so providing the backup from the records will have charge.
Second, the reading asserts that using the electronic medical records will prevent medical errors. To argue with this statement, the professor says that electronic records would not eliminate the chances of reducing errors. According to the professor, the doctors would definitely are required to take notes to prescribe medicine for their patients, and this prescription should be red by medical stuff. As a result, the probable bad handwriting of the doctors is still remaining and may cause severe consequences.
Third, the reading states that there might be some benefits from further research and the electronic records can be helpful. The professor cast doubts on this point by explaining that it is difficult for researchers to access the medical records in the united states due to strict and privacy legislation. She also mentions that if the researchers want to collect data, they must get a permission from an official organization and also from the patients, which is not a granted idea. Additionally, some patients do not let others have access to their information unless this information is used for their own cure process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30463576159 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80600957775 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9491440054 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503648217164 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177027157148 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105756759163 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315268918891 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242302867361 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.