tpo 47

Essay topics:

tpo 47

The material discusses the concept of large pterosaurs are capable of powered flight. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points the pterosaurs may be cooled-blooded animals which have slow metabolism and unable to produce the energy needed for powered flights. Another point worth noting, the pterosaurs were so large and so heavy to airborne by powered flight. One final point, the muscles of their back legs were too small and weak to allow them to run fast or even jump high enough to fly.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is the pterosaurs fossils discovered that they had a dense hair like fur likes the warm-blooded animals with fast metabolism that supplied them with the energy required for powered flights. Next, their bones were hollow instead of solid made them had delight weight despite their large body frames, their light weight allowed them to keep themselves airborne by flapping their wings. Finally, unlike the birds which just use two leg to run and fly, the pterosaurs walked on all four limbs and used them to push of the ground. Consequently, using the four limbs to run fast enough and to jump high enough allowed them to lunch themselves into the air.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erosaurs are capable of powered flight. While the reading looks at the topic from one...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
... despite their large body frames, their light weight allowed them to keep themselves airborn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09865470852 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50814996042 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582959641256 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7281593442 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412081361114 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170518478789 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762375045976 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275196418133 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118880902827 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.