In the reading passage, the author asserts three reasons why the Pterosaurs are not capable of powered flight, which was refuted by the professor in the lecture who claims Pterosaurs could be capable of powered flight.
First, the author suggests that since the Pterosaurs, might as other ancient reptiles, are cold-blooded, they cannot offer enough energy to fly. However, the professor indicates that the Pterosaurs's fossil indicates that the the Pterosaurs have fur covering which is the main feature of the modern bird. Therefore the the Pterosaurs could be warm-blooded. With fur covering and being ward-blooded. The Pterosaurs could produce enough energy to fly.
Second, the author mentions that the Pterosaurs is too heavy to fly. In contrast, the professor points out that there are plenty of characteristic of Pterosaurs' body which could make them light enough to fly. Their bone, for example, are hollow so they can reduce the total weight. Therefore the Pterosaurs are light enough to fly.
Finally, the author insists that the Pterosaurs' back leg are too weak to run fast enough to take off as the modern bird. Nevertheless, the professor claims refutes that there are difference between the modern birds and the Pterosaurs since the modern birds use two legs to take off while the Pterosaurs use all four limbs to take off. According to the recent research, even the most largest Pterosaurs could use their four limbs to run as fast as the modern birds and take off.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...t the Pterosaurss fossil indicates that the the Pterosaurs have fur covering which is t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...t the Pterosaurss fossil indicates that the the Pterosaurs have fur covering which is t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...is the main feature of the modern bird. Therefore the the Pterosaurs could be warm-bloode...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n feature of the modern bird. Therefore the the Pterosaurs could be warm-blooded. With ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n feature of the modern bird. Therefore the the Pterosaurs could be warm-blooded. With ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ow so they can reduce the total weight. Therefore the Pterosaurs are light enough to fly....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'largest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: largest
...ording to the recent research, even the most largest Pterosaurs could use their four limbs t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the largest'.
Suggestion: most the largest
...ording to the recent research, even the most largest Pterosaurs could use their four limbs t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59649589263 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473469387755 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7267941617 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7692307692 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338223603995 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134067332314 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387045711128 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204594369467 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00822707845056 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.