TPO 48-Integrated
The reading claims that the number of frog species decline recently and it has a bad effect on humans' live. So it presents three solutions to prevent this extinction. However, the lecturer finds all ideas which have been mentioned by the reading dubious and provides some evidences to refute them all.
At first place, the author argues that frogs have been killed by pesticides which are used to protect farm crops by farmers. It suggests that the governments must take an action and implement law that prohibits the farmers from utilizing them. In contrast, the professor brings up the idea that this solution is not economic and it seems not fair. The farmers must use them to decrease illnesses on their crops and compete with other farmers. These laws have a severe disadvantages on their lives and they lose more crops and yields.
Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that fungus that has deadly effect kills the frogs and their population decline. It causes thickening their skin and they cannot get water by their skin. So they will die because of dehydration. The scientists find the treatment that kills this fungus with heat. On the contrary, the speaker underlines the fact that this treatment must be done on each frog. So it is very difficult process because they must capture them individually and treat on them. Also they cannot prevent to continuing this disease to next generation and this treatment must be done again and again on new offspring. According to above mention this treatment is so expensive and complex.
Finally the reading passage holds the view that their inhabitant is in dangerous condition because of using people for construction and development. It suggests that water habitats such as lakes and marshes protected from using by people and save the frogs. Conversely, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that these using do not have disadvantage on their lives. The key problem is global warming that cause of disappearing water on the world. This is unlikely change that threat the frogs' lives and cast many problem for their habitats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es some evidences to refute them all. At first place, the author argues that f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'disadvantage'?
Suggestion: disadvantage
...other farmers. These laws have a severe disadvantages on their lives and they lose more crops...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and they lose more crops and yields. Furthermore, the reading passage asserts...
^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re them individually and treat on them. Also they cannot prevent to continuing this ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reatment is so expensive and complex. Finally the reading passage holds the vi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ment is so expensive and complex. Finally the reading passage holds the view that...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...ge that threat the frogs lives and cast many problem for their habitats.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 22.412803532 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50702848742 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0123008848 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.619047619 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 4.45695364238 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371742421579 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105069862105 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801038437086 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218184515665 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583137204015 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.