The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is population decline of frogs, but the listening casts doubt at three main points.
At the first point, the reading states that pesticides cause bad effect on frogs, they usually spread from farmland to nearby habitats of frogs. For this reason, the law of eliminating the use of them by farmers will be beneficial. According to the listening, this kind of law will be unfair in the economic field. The farmers near the frogs' habitats can get disadvantage results. These include losing crops and lower yield.
At the second point, the reading believes that fungi can cause dehydration in frogs because frogs use their skin to take in water. There are several methods can protect them from infection. On the contrary, the listening argues that these have to be applied in each individual, but it is difficult on a large scale. In addition, these also have to be repeated with the new generation of frogs. All show that this method is expensive and complicated.
At the last point, the reading mentions that frogs rely so much on water habitat, so the excessive water use of humans can make a huge threat to their population. Giving insurance to these habitats is an effective way. However, the listening confirms that these activities of humans are not the biggest causes. The biggest is global warming. It forces many water habitats to dry. In that case, the protection from the activities of humans is not effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52841000292 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543650793651 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0687443106 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3529411765 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8235294118 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34847957454 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931312826711 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07985910712 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190137276384 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875291861014 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.