In this set of materials, the reading passage offers three methods in order to solve the problem of declining frog population. But in the eyes of the lecture, none of these solutions are practical and each of them have problems.
First of all, the author believes that pesticides which farmers used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops cause severe breathing problems for frogs, and suggests that farmers should not use these chemical substances. However, the speaker refutes this method and says if farmers don't use pesticides, they may lose more crops and can't compete with others in the market.
Moreover, the writer expresses fungus makes infection in frogs and offers several ways to treat or prevent it by antifungal medication or killing the fungus with heat. In contrast, based on the lecture, this method is not practical because performing this solution for frogs individually in large scale are very difficult. Besides, this method needs to be performed for every generation of frogs separately, which is very complicated and expensive.
Also, based on the reading passage, human activities in natural habitats make lakes and marshes disappear and dry, which in turn cause declining in frog population, and must protect them from excessive water use and development. But, the speaker disagrees and says that global warming makes lakes and marshes to disappear not human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...refutes this method and says if farmers dont use pesticides, they may lose more crop...
^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esticides, they may lose more crops and cant compete with others in the market. Mor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26339285714 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60018871347 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7597364553 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378018729338 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141003944935 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829432264484 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202064116177 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408677144289 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.