The reading and the lecture are both about the causes of the decreasing in the number of the frog in their habitats. Each provides three reasons to support that. The author and the speaker cast doubt on each other.
Frist of all the author claims that one of the reasonable causes that's frogs number decreases is the use of the pesticides. These chemicals not only the insects in the frog habitats but also affect on the central nervous systems of the these frogs
On the other hand, the speaker of the listening contradicts this idea. He states that it is seriously unfair to rely on the pesticides as a reason for that. He elaborates on his idea by saying that, the farmers will be economically affected. in addition to that, the farmers will be unable to compete with other farmers in other areas. The crops will decrease and lower the yield.
Secondly, The fungus infection which attacks the from skin leads to thickening of the skin and hence, will kill the frog because of the dehydration. He states that the use of thermal heat to kill the fungus will kill the frogs as well. ON the hand The Professor refutes this point. He argues that The use of the antifungal is a complicated and difficult way to use. He also explains that the large scale and should be used again and again. Nevertheless, is not guaranteed that will be inherited to next offsprings.
Lastly, The tutor in reading claims that The frogs lay their eggs on wetland habitat, and because of the people developing the frogs, natural habitat decreased. The Teacher defeats this argument. He states the reason of that is the global warming. Moreover, he suggests that the decrease in the wetland and marshes will be unlikely, but the global warming will increase the wetlands and causes death even extinction of these species.
To sum up, The reading and lecture talk about the extinction of the frogs. Each supports his ideas by providing three reasons and both contradict each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...laims that one of the reasonable causes thats frogs number decreases is the use of th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e insects in the frog habitats but also affect on the central nervous systems of the thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the listening contradicts this idea. He states that it is seriously unfair to...
^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... farmers will be economically affected. in addition to that, the farmers will be u...
^^
Line 6, column 50, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
... The fungus infection which attacks the from skin leads to thickening of the skin an...
^^^^
Line 6, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gues that The use of the antifungal is a complicated and difficult way to use. He...
^^
Line 6, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be used again and again. Nevertheless, is not guaranteed that will be inherited...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78005865103 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44621541695 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478005865103 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4107981605 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.619047619 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2380952381 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244035281952 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708663261604 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818568805014 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133729442023 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944294663855 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.