In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on the all the solusions presented in the reading passage about the saving the frogs species around the world and preventing their population decline. The professor states non of these solusions are practical and solve the problem.
First of all, the lecturer states decreasing the use of pestiside in farmeland near the sensitive frog population which was suggested in the reading is not practical and fair. This outcompetes the farmers who have farmland out of sensitive area compare to farmers who work in sensitive area and can not use pesticide. This has sever disadvantage for them and makes their crop less and their profit lesser.
Secondly, the speaker claimes the fungus skin in frog population needs indivitual treatment for every frog which is very difficult. Capturing and treating thick skin frogs due to fungus is not an easy task. In addition, the disease passes to offsprings and each new generation of frog need indivitual treatment. This is contradicted to the reading passage.
Lastly, the professor states threatened wet habitats for frog is not only due to human action and global warming had lots of effect on entire species not the frog and all the species are declining due to global warming and less using wetland seems to be useless and unlikely to help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...he reading passage about the saving the frogs species around the world and preventing...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lesser. Secondly, the speaker claimes the fungus skin in frog population needs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03539823009 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57956632491 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1633095001 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379474710408 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133495362385 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826908717536 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212653239195 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452839085829 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.