TPO 48 Writing Integrated
In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
The reading passage discusses several methods to solve the problem of declining frog populations. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and casts doubt on the reasons provided by the reading passage.
First, the author claims that imposing law restrictions on the usage of pesticides near sensitive frog populations by farmers would cause a dramatic effect on slowing down the decline of frog populations. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this method is not economically reliable. It would cause problems for farmers near these frog populations since they lose a large amount of their crops. Therefore, it becomes difficult for them to stay active in competitive markets of crops.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that special treatments on a large scale could treat the infections caused by the spread of a detrimental fungus around the world. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that applying the method is not practical. Because every frog should be treated individually. Therefore, each frog in every target region should be captured and treated which seems almost impossible. In additions, the treatment does not have prolonged impact and the effects aren't passed to the next generation. Thus, the new offsprings should be treated as well.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that to reduce threatens of the frogs' natural habitats human activities such as water use should be limited. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue due to the fact that although restricting human activities such as protection from excessive water use could be beneficial, this process actually does not have any noticeable effect on recovering frog populations. In fact, global warming has been the real threat to water resources. Consequently, since global warming is the major factor which causes the loss of a lot of species every year, it is unlikely that limiting human activities be helpful and bring about influential results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t applying the method is not practical. Because every frog should be treated individual...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...t have prolonged impact and the effects arent passed to the next generation. Thus, th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36977491961 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78269766456 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578778135048 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9884514068 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416159460591 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119056379156 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105953410298 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22186604025 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735251320759 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.