The lecture is mainly about the extinction of the frog's population in the world. The author of the reading states three ways to solve the problem of declining frog populations. The lecture challenges the claim made by the author by considering the ways shown by the author of reading as impractical and counter each of them individually. She is of the opinion that solutions suggested by the author of the reading are impractical and cannot implemented in real world.
To begin with, the author suggest that frogs are being harmed by the pesticides. The article mentions that laws should be made to prohibit the using of harmful chemicals in the farms . This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She claims that this solution is not practical and fair. Pesticides are used by the farmers to decrease crop losses and to be competitive in the market. If the they are prohibited then it will be severe unfair to farmers of that area and will reduce their yield.
Secondly, the writer suggest that because of the fungal infection death is observed of the frog. Fungal infection causes the dehydration for the frogs. The lecture however rebuts the claim by mentioning that protecting from the fungal infection is not practical and very expensive . she elaborates it by saying that for doing this each and every frog should be captured and treated individually for the infection which is quite unrealistic. And that too will not prevent offspring from the infection they need to be treated separately too.
Finally the author posits that natural habitats of the frog are being exploited because of the human activities. Moreover in article it is stated that as most of frog species lay egg in water it is difficult for them to lay eggs as lakes are in danger of extinction. In contrast lecturer's position is that global warming is the biggest reason for the draining of the wetlands not only the human activities. But global warming can't be stopped as it damage which can't be reversed back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...e is mainly about the extinction of the frogs population in the world. The author of ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... problem of declining frog populations. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...thor of the reading are impractical and cant implemented in real world. To begin ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To begin with, the author suggest that frogs are being harmed by the pesticides...
^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... using of harmful chemicals in the farms . This specific argument is challenged by...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...and to be competitive in the market. If the they are prohibited then it will be severe u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tion is not practical and very expensive . she elaborates it by saying that for do...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...n is not practical and very expensive . she elaborates it by saying that for doing ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...y need to be treated separately too. Finally the author posits that natural habitats...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...loited because of the human activities. Moreover in article it is stated that as most of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...t is difficult for them to lay eggs. In contrast lecturers position is that global warmi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...he human activities. But global warming cant be stopped as it damage which cant be r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ming cant be stopped as it damage which cant be reversed back.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90634441088 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6329880972 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468277945619 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8294387498 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4736842105 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28537691968 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855855203253 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725702264854 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160031073707 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151444467448 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.