The article states that humpback wales migrate far distances through stars and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the idea is fascinating, but the reasons are not rational and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the whales have cognitive ability to find their routes through stars. However, the professor cast doubts on this point by saying that they are not far intelligent. He explains that the idea is more considerable in animals, like birds and provides an example of duck to illustrate this. Accordingly, this is an intrinsic characteristic and does not have any correlation to intelligence. Also, the whales use the ability in the same way as ducks.
Second, the article avers that the wales swim in the direct through guidance of stars. The professor contends this point by saying that they do not use any star to find their direction. He asserts that the wales have magnetic ability which help them to find direction. He thinks that magnetic forces are the only forces that they use to immigrate in straight line.
Finally, The passage asserts that humpbacks whales have bizarre ability in which come to the surface for watching stars to discover direction. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point. He explains that the animals like sharks look at their prey to find routes. He cast doubts on this idea to ask about the time that stars are not in the sky. correspondingly, speculation never comes to fruition since the whales also migrate during the day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... through stars and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor expla...
^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is fascinating, but the reasons are not rational and refutes each of the author&...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to illustrate this. Accordingly, this is an intrinsic characteristic and does not...
^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tic and does not have any correlation to intelligence. Also, the whales use the a...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...t the wales have magnetic ability which help them to find direction. He thinks that magnetic forc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ic forces are the only forces that they use to immigrate in straight line. Final...
^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humpbacks'' or 'humpback's'?
Suggestion: humpbacks'; humpback's
...e. Finally, The passage asserts that humpbacks whales have bizarre ability in which co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Correspondingly
...the time that stars are not in the sky. correspondingly, speculation never comes to fruition si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, look, nevertheless, second, so, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08203125 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65666069895 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0517433276 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3125 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283485837142 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087520876328 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502505727152 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165253098874 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050268634607 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.