The quality of education is an important part of student's lives. Effective teaching procedure leads to more reliable student in near future. Actually, more than a few students have enough knowledge to deal with essential problems in their professional career. The most important question regarding this is that if the education quality will be more effective by increasing salaries of professors or not. From my point of view, I assert that the university should increase professor's salary and in what follows I will attempt to address the most discernible reasons.
First, professors will be more enthusiastic to do their job if the amount of salary increases. Albeit, the money is not the most important part of education but It can solve most of the professor's problem; The differences between professors in different university in my country is a good example of this. Accordingly, in my country 'IRAN', professors who serves their job in governmental university such as "Sharif university " make more budget while those of in private university have less income. According to a new research, the professors of governmental university assign more time to their students and this helped the education to be more effective in that area. That research taught me that money can increase the level of quality in universities.
In addition, professors work in fewer hours during the week. According to this, common working hours in each week is 40 hours which can be a negative point, but if they make more money the office hours will be reduced to less than 30 hours which will result in higher quality in education. For example, the time that I was in master, new role raised professor's salary and attenuate their weekly work hours; Afterward, the professors spend more time on students by solving more problems. Based on university, that change increases grade of student which have direct correlation to quality of education.
Finally, professors will have more time to work on article. This is an important point in level of education of country. For instance, the country that publish more article in authentic journals, will have higher rank in universe. Nonetheless, there are some conference and less important journals that may not count as efficient as authentic one are. Also, in each year, five top most country would take prize in help of creative method and this is the best epitome of education quality which defines as production of science.
All in all, as the aforementioned examples have illustrated, professors should have more salary that helps education to have more quality. Not only professor will have more enthusiastic but also it decreases work hours and helps professors to participate in publication. Therefore, I think that university should increase the income of professor for better quality in education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... education but It can solve most of the professors problem; The differences between profes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e that I was in master, new role raised professors salary and attenuate their weekly work ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20607375271 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85696555824 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457700650759 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0350106696 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86363636364 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278536150457 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892919971938 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728636217597 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170570646535 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609867769093 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.