In this set of the materials, the author of the reading passage discusses three hypotheses of humpback whales may be navigating by the stars to migrate long distance. However, the professor thinks the author's theories contain defects.
First of all, the author claims that humpback whales are smart enough to develop their cognitive ability, and this ability can let humpback whales observe night sky to orientate. On the contrary, the professor indicates that connections between the intelligent and cognitive ability are not related. Professor uses the ducks as an example, ducks don't have highly intelligent, however, the ducks have cognitive ability to orientate. In fact, it about the instinct instead of the intelligent.
In addition, the author states that humpback whales use the stars for external signs to maintain direction over long distances. However, the professor asserts that the humpback whales have the internal bio magnitude can sense earth magnet. Therefore, the whales are able to migrate long distance due to the earth orient field.
Finally, the author raises the point that humpback whales have an ability called spy-hopping. Humpback whales can look at the star for information to navigate. On the other hand, the professor refutes the author's idea by saying spy-hopping is not related to looking at stars for navigating. Using the sharks as an example, sharks have an ability of spy- hopping. However, sharks don't migrate, they use this ability to hunt other animals. Furthermore, the humpback whales do spy-hopping always during the day. They can't ever see the star in the daytime. Therefore, spy-hopping for navigation is the only speculation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sor uses the ducks as an example, ducks dont have highly intelligent, however, the d...
^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e other hand, the professor refutes the authors idea by saying spy-hopping is not relat...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bility of spy- hopping. However, sharks dont migrate, they use this ability to hunt ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 515, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...spy-hopping always during the day. They cant ever see the star in the daytime. There...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, look, may, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36742424242 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68950864032 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.231855049 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3529411765 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457325154311 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151264542662 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959106271221 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274187210553 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870406850505 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.