The article states that humpback whales be navigating by the stars like early human sailors to migrate long distances for feeding and mating goals. However, the professor explains none of the author’s reasons are convincing and rejects them one-by-one.
To begin with, humpback whales are intelligent enough to use stars to find their ways, as the reading claims, is refuted by the professor. He asserts that there is no connection between intelligence and whale’s activities. For examples, some birds were intelligent when they born and they use stars to navigates, but there is no connection between their intelligence and their activities.
Furthermore, according to the essay, animals orient themselves by some external forces or objects. The professor argues that in animal’s mind there is magnetic ability and by this ability they can recognize earth magnetics’ field and find their ways based on that not by navigating stars.
At the end, based on author’s opinion, humpback whales show unnatural behaviors named spy-hopping and they looking at stars to navigate by that. In the contrary the professor shows that there is no connection between spy-hopping and navigating. In marine areas sharks and humpback whales looking for hunt based on spy-hopping and they do not looking at stars specially at nights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that humpback whales ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vincing and rejects them one-by-one. To begin with, humpback whales are intel...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'navigate'.
Suggestion: navigate
...nt when they born and they use stars to navigates, but there is no connection between the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r intelligence and their activities. Furthermore, according to the essay, ani...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed on that not by navigating stars. At the end, based on author's opini...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t looking at stars specially at nights.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49038461538 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98616137597 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9217253497 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394174827093 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15467746467 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106070759178 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227358972987 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067969651682 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.