The article states that a humpback whales are the answer for the puzzling question of how animals control to migrate for extremely large distance. The reading passage gives three reasons of support, but the professor refutes each of these points.
First, the reading states that the humpback whales are seems to be very smart to navigate the stars as their brains are too complex and the article supposed that brain complexity is the mean of intelligence. But the professor refutes this point by saying that there is not any evidence for stars navigate and he gives an example of ducks as they also used to navigate stars but they are not seem to be very smart. In order to that, intelligence is not an evidence of star navigation.
Second, the reading passage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that the power is the reason for maintain animals movement to be in a straight direction for very long distances. However the professor opposes that point by explained that the reason for make them directed in straight lines is the magnification as the humpbacks are able to oriented themselves and moved in straight way by the force of magnification field.
Third, the reading passage posses that humpback whales exhibit a strange behavior as they are often observed floating straight up for minutes. Although the professor explained that for instance sharks do not look for stars while their migration, they look for the animals that they want to hunt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...used to navigate stars but they are not seem to be very smart. In order to that, int...
^^^^
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
...assage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ight direction for very long distances. However the professor opposes that point by exp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50975672343 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2349711788 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428826836124 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179690083786 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959062363524 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258744786414 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057469574031 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.