tpo 5 the Chaco great houses
The material discusses the usage of the Chaco great building. While the reading suggests three theories that could determine the building usage, the listening challenges all these suggestions and says that none of them is convincing
First, the author mentions that Chaco structures could be used for residential. on the other hand, the professor opposes this and states that this building looks like native Americans' apartments just from outside. The lecture adds that there is a doubt that this building was used for residential when they look at the building from inside. the speaker explains that if people habitat these buildings, they supposed to have many fireplaces for daily cooking. However, the listening claims that in the largest Chaco building, there are just ten fireplaces, while the rooms of the house are very big that could fit a hundred families. Consequently, these buildings could not be used for residential.
Second, the writer states that these buildings could be storage. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and points out that the large empty rooms in the building could be a storage, but they do not contain maize containers. The professor adds that if these buildings were storage, it is supposed to have maize on the ground or maize remaining containers.
Third, the author posits that the Chaco building could be used to celebrate ceremonies. Conversely, the speaker contradicts this and contends that besides the broken pots, there are building material and construction tools. The professor explains that all of this stuff might be trash when the Chaco structures were built. In addition to that, the lecturer states that pots might be from the meals of the construction workers. The speaker concludes that finding these pots is not good evidence that these buildings were used for special ceremonies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ructures could be used for residential. on the other hand, the professor opposes t...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... they look at the building from inside. the speaker explains that if people habitat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59892531925 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478114478114 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6843323908 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899898304222 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040952578061 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072382614975 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620606026223 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418741225864 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.