The reading and the lecture are both about travel to Mars. The author of the passage feels that it is problematic to send people on Mars. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that humanity have found the solutions to problems suggested.
To begin with, the author argues that constrained storage of food, water and air will be an issue. The article mentions that roundtrip to Mars will take two years and spacecraft has no enough space for needed enormous amount of food. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that hydroponics, growing plants in water, without soil, can be used as a solution.This kind of crops will not take much space, waste water can be recycle and used for drinking and plants will create fresh air for astronauts.
Secondly, the writer suggests that continuous pastime on zero-gravity area will cause health problems such as decrease of muscle strength and decline of bone density. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that people have an experience staying on zero-gravity locations. She elaborates on this by bringing up point that regular exercises and vitamins will support muscle tone and bone density.
Finally, the author posits that unlike Earth Mars is not protected from Sun radiation, so hazardous amount will be harmful. Moreover, it is stated in the article that making a shield all over the spaceship will disadvantageously increase mass of the rocket. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that radiation does not occur all the time, it is only occasional, so small shield may be carried on spacecraft. Major work will be done on open space, whereas during radiation period under shielded area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is problematic to send people on Mars. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...without soil, can be used as a solution.This kind of crops will not take much space,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in contrast, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08480565371 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68725998557 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600706713781 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1916188416 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.054163425379 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200550933487 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300252423805 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0331791787323 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185612867837 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.