The reading and lecture are both discusses the chances of sending humans to Marc in future. Whereas the author of the reading states that it would be really difficult to send human on Marc as scientists may have to face some problems. On the other hand, lecturer states that even though trip to March is little challenging, scientist have found solution for those problems. Thus, the speaker cast doubt on the main idea made in the reading section by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, round-trip to Marc will take at least two long years which may be create problems for the scientist because cargo capacity of space is limited. Hence it would not be possible to load food, water and oxygen source in the cargo for two years. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that astronauts can use hydroponics technique in which they could be able to cultivate plant in the spacecraft and use it for food purpose. Furthermore, She mentions that this plant have ability to purify wastewater which they can use as a drinking water source. Also, plant releases oxygen and absorbs carbon dioxide, which also help them to inhale fresh air.
Secondly, the writer contends that scientist have to stay in zero-gravity environments for long time which may create serious health issues such as decreased muscle mass and lower bone density. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that astronauts can prevent the negative impact of gravity on body mass and bone by doing everyday exercises. She elaborated by mentioning that they can avoid a damage of bone by regular intake of vitamins and nutrition.
Finally, it is stated in the article that astronauts will be exposed to dangerous radiation emitted by Sun and constructing a shield to protect this radiation is impossible at current scenario. The speaker, on the other hand, posits that solar radiation are occasionally released when it is active. She added that space graft can be equipped with special instruments which have an ability to monitor space radiations. Additionally, small shelter which can protect astronauts from dangerous radiations. As a result, they can protect themselves in protective shields, whenever the instruments give an alert about the solar radiation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s the chances of sending humans to Marc in future. Whereas the author of the reading stat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...use cargo capacity of space is limited. Hence it would not be possible to load food, ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that this plant have ability to purify wastewater which they can use as a drink...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...rated by mentioning that they can avoid a damage of bone by regular intake of vitamins a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, at least, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 372.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11021505376 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64680400735 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9927185352 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634862230334 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214680749705 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255277705234 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417575415957 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321178284855 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.