TPO 51
surprising elephants behavior, death, aware, paint, canvas, mice
In this set of material, both the author of the reading passage and the lecturer are discussing elephant behaviors. Although the author declares that the elephants have abnormal behaviors, the professor casts doubt about the author's claims. She believes it results from misunderstanding of their behaviors. In what follows, the reasons for both the author of the reading and the lecturer will be substantiated.
Firstly, both the reading and talk have a debate on elephants awareness of their death time. According to the passage, it is said that they know end of their life when they become weak and old. So, this cause they cut their connection from herds and become alone near the water supplies. On the other hand, the professor states that it causes by elephants' old teeth. They look for soft vegetation that grow near water supplies, and after a few moments, they will die there.
Secondly, the author and the lecturer express their opinion about elephants' painting skill. The author acclaims that they can paint with their trunks on a canvas. In contrast, the professor proclaims that ears of elephants are sensitive as well as human ears to remember and follow the sounds like sound of brush on canvas. Therefore, they can paint line instead of flowers.
Finally, the author announces that elephants have a scarce of mice. But, the professor says, some scientists consider their reaction on mice. They react due to see unfamiliar animal that is not in the zoo.
In conclusion, both the author and the lecturer are giving their opinion about the elephants behavior that is in contrast with each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elephants'' or 'elephant's'?
Suggestion: elephants'; elephant's
...h the reading and talk have a debate on elephants awareness of their death time. Accordin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elephants'' or 'elephant's'?
Suggestion: elephants'; elephant's
...urer are giving their opinion about the elephants behavior that is in contrast with each ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00371747212 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52474658065 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524163568773 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3280339708 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1764705882 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161556395013 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573917499989 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496572809558 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964007806139 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466842718496 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.