TPO- 52
The reading states that asteroids are the best option to colonize on them and provide three reasons of supports. However, the professor claims even though, it is practical to land on them but there are various downsides to it and refutes each of the reasons.
First, the reading states that because of low gravity which is available on the asteroids, it is easy to land on them. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that although because of low gravity landing in an asteroid is easy, it puts the human's body under a great risk because the body of the humans tends to lose mass when there is a low gravity. In the spaceship where there is low gravity, individuals suffer from body aching. Accordingly, it would have a long-term consequence to the colonies' health.
Second, the lecture states that the asteroids are a really profitable source of precious materials like gold. The professor refutes this point and claims that it is not cost effective idea to mine precious metal from the asteroids because there are various factors like transporting them to the earth would add cost to the mining. Furthermore, the price of the metal would not be always the same, since if we supply more precious metals to the earth it would decline the market price of them.
Third, people can easily land on the asteroids because they are close to the earth. However, the professor contends that although it is probably easy to step on the asteroid, it is quite hard to return back to earth due to the fact that orbits of the asteroids are really unusual. When they are close to the earth, we can go there easily, but they would not stay closed forever. Accordingly getting back from asteroids would be a challenge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colonies'' or 'coloni's', 'colony's'?
Suggestion: colonies'; coloni's; colony's
...uld have a long-term consequence to the colonies health. Second, the lecture states t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line the market price of them. Third, people can easily land on the asteroids ...
^^^
Line 6, column 198, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...ep on the asteroid, it is quite hard to return back to earth due to the fact that orbits of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...but they would not stay closed forever. Accordingly getting back from asteroids would be a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ck from asteroids would be a challenge.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43323287464 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8140403536 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.