“Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.”
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Social Corporation Responsibility (SCR) is an emerging concept in management. Ubiquetelsy, many firms consider this approach in their managing style. Critics of this view, believe that companies' main role is to increase their value to distribute more profit to the stakeholders. on the contrary, others think that firms cannot turn a blind eye to their responsibility on the society and companies should embark on initiative projects in order to help the society. I believe that the main role of the enterprise is to make as much profit as possible.
The ultimate goal of a company is to have a constant increase in its profit in order to attract more investment and consequently more costumer. The reason that a company runs is profit. If it fails to increase their income, no more investors would be motivated to invest in their stocks meaning that they will not able to develop their products. Furthermore, if a company focused mainly on the profit, it would lift up the quality of the products as well as it would decrease the price of it. It is mainly because we are living in a competitive world and for surviving in this environment, firms should compete with each other resulting in high quality and lower price which burgeons the quality of people’s lives
Secondly, respecting the needs of society will increase the value of the company. It is commonly accepted that social responsibility projects have a considerable potential to increase the value of the company. In this view, stakeholders should have a long-term perspective and devote a part of the firm’s budget to help people in society. As a matter of fact, these kinds of projects would enhance respect of costumes to the particular brand. For example, Walmart, the giant retail store, started a project named Women empowerment. In this project, Walmart helped the development of small and medium enterprises ran by women in the developing countries. Although they Spent more than 16 million dollars for 6 years, the studies by scholars evaluated that it increased the brand value of Walmart and the tendency of people to shop more in their stores. The example illustrates the point that social responsibility projects and profit making of a company have a correlation.
In conclusion, I believe that the main function of the company is to enhance its profit but investing on CSR projects which do not have any profit in short-term will increase the value of the company as well as the profit of shareholders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging concept in management. Ubiquetelsy, many firms consider this approach in the...
^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ribute more profit to the stakeholders. on the contrary, others think that firms c...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'costumer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: costumer
...ttract more investment and consequently more costumer. The reason that a company runs is prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00963855422 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91895065029 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477108433735 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4231873665 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162455447342 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529356732607 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041367097132 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103223765144 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234184539238 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.