TPO 52 integrated writing
The reading discusses that sending people to asteroids would be the best colonization. The author listed three reasons to support this idea. However, the speaker states that it is not practical and presents some evidence to refute all the reasons.
First, the author mentioned that low gravity causes the landing and taking off easier and safer. Also, they can carry more equipment to astroids with lower fuels. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that it accompanied by some risks such as loosing muscle mass or bone density. Hence, people suffer some health problems.
Secondly, the author points out that it provides the valuable metal sources like golden and platinum that they bring profite. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this issue by standing that it needs a tremendouse cost for supporting the colonies and trasfering the metals. Besides, there is no garauntee that the price of the metal stay the same, in fact, by increasing the supply the price will decrease. Thus, it could not be profitable.
Last but not least, the reading paasage proposes that some astroids come periodically within or near the earth's orbit and it makes reaching to them easy. On the contrary, in contradiction to the reading passage, the speaker claims that it is true that it is easy to reach but it is not easy to return. Due to the fact that some astroids have unusual behavior, they make it difficult. Some of them move away from earth and do not stay near the earth. As a matter of fact, they sometimes travel as far as Mars which makes returning challenging. In conclusion, according to the listening material, an argument that sending human to astroids has some advantagouse is unwarranted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is true that it is easy to reach but it is not easy to return. Due to the fact t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93379790941 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55890076893 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8351916885 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2941176471 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0588235294 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.