TPO 52 integrated writing
The article states that there are so many asteroids in our solar system that we can colonize them. However, the professor explains that asteroid colonization is not practical and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that asteroids have lower gravity than planets, which makes it easier for take-off and landing and carries much lower fuel. The professor refutes this point by stating that lower gravity makes our take-off and landing much more accessible, but there are certain risks that make our astronauts' health problems. For, lower gravity makes our muscle mass low as well as bone density, for instance, in our space stations our astronauts have issues with these health problems and a long period of living our colonies on asteroids makes it worse.
Second, the article states that we can mine valuable and rare metals on asteroids. However, the professor contends that it is not neseserly profitable action the reading did not pay attention to the whole picture t is cost very much to makes colonies and mine metals as well as return them to earth. We can not guarantee that increasing valuable metals on earth make their markets lower Hence, it is not profitable.
Third, the reading avers that asteroids are easy to reach. The lecture opposes this point by saying that they are easy to reach. However, not easy to return always. The asteroid comes near the earth and then gets further .for, the orbit they are even can reach to Mars, and it is not easy to return. It is very challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mes near the earth and then gets further .for, the orbit they are even can reach t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, then, third, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32911848119 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511538461538 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.761405998 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1538461538 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352533290061 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122075022147 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765018281925 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199420955096 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416568868375 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.