tpo 53 high taxes for unhealthy products
The material discusses the concept of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy behaviors. While the reading states many social benefits for this approach, the listening challenges all these benefits.
First, the author mentions that these taxes can discourage people from unhealthy behaviors. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and mentions that these taxes could lead people to but cheaper or low-quality cigarettes. The lecturer adds that these cheaper cigarettes have more harmful substances than quality cigarettes, so they may pose greater health risks. In addition to that, the speaker adds that people could continue to buy unhealthy food, even it has high taxes. The lecturer explains that if people spend more money on this unhealthy food, they may have less money left to buy healthy food.
Second, the author claims that implementing high taxes for unhealthy products is financially fair. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and mentions that governments should take incomes into consideration. The professor explains that low- income families could suffer, while high-income ones would be ok. The speaker posits that taxes could are a much greater burden of low-income families.
Third, the reading contends that these taxes would increase governments' revenue. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and claims that these revenues could have a downside. The lecturer explains that governments will depend on this money, so they do not pay attention to limit these unhealthy behaviors. Moreover, the speaker adds that governments will adapt to it and do not put banning rules to stop people from smoking in public areas. The professor states that because governments do not want to lose this income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nments do not want to lose this income.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45220588235 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61057113277 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7182299852 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6875 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198905637679 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787737381728 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102487981002 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140752093444 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677237155674 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.